Showing posts with label President Obama. Show all posts
Showing posts with label President Obama. Show all posts

Friday, July 15, 2016

Nice - Another day, another attack

Another day, another atrocity. 
Paris 130 slaughtered
Brussels 34 slaughtered
Orlando 49 slaughtered
Karada - > 292 slaughtered

And now Nice 84 (so far) slaughtered

That’s a short extract from a horrifically long list.

Back on March 23, 2016, I closed my blog – see here – with a request that people don’t put flowers or lighted candles on street corners, don’t post Je Suis …. on social media.  Instead use the energy to tell your elected representatives – enough!

I repeat this request following the horrific events that have unfolded overnight, from Nice, France. 

At the height (or maybe it will get still higher?) of the refugee influx, there was a photo published that circulated the World.  This was of the child called Aylan Kurdi who had drowned while his family tried to reach Europe. 

Today there is a new image.  The picture of a young child, seemingly a girl, lying dead under a thermal blanket, on the streets of Nice.  Her doll lies nearby.  I can’t get this image from my head.  

Unlike the parents of Aylan, her parents did not act irresponsibly, by taking their family onto an overcrowded, likely un-seaworthy vessel.  No, they took their child out to celebrate France’s national day.  The time when France’s citizens celebrate Liberte,  Egalite et  Fraternite (Liberty, equality and fraternity) was used to randomly attack such notions.

And let’s not pussyfoot around this.  We can be very sure that this is yet another attack from the followers of Islam.  The followers of the ‘religion of peace’ as it is usually called by Obama, Clinton and all of their other ‘head in the sand’ liberals. 

In many ways I can understand Obama’s position.  He was raised amongst Muslims and is said by many to actually be a follower of this murderous religion.

Similarly, I can see where Hillary Clinton is coming from.  Her Clinton Foundation receives significant donations – in the $10s of millions, from Saudi Arabia and other Arabian Gulf countries.  She simply cannot turn on the people who finance her - even when it is abundantly clear that Saudi Arabia funds Sunni terrorists, around the World.  This is done through direct arming of them, in places like Syria and earlier, Afghanistan, and also through indoctrination in so called ‘radicalised’ mosques throughout the West – USA, France, UK and now Germany being particular targets.

I am not sure I can understand why feminists and homosexuals are such strident supporters of Islam, a religion that pushes an ideology that is the polar opposite of that for which feminists and homosexuals stand.  My question to them is, when was the last time you saw the ‘evil West’ throwing homosexuals off of buildings or hanging them, for their ‘crime’ from the jib of a crane. Or stoning a woman to death because she ‘allowed’ herself to be raped? You can certainly regularly see such abominable acts being carried out, across social media.  Similarly, consider this, to which religion do the people who cut-off heads, on social media, adhere?

After the March 2016 attack in Brussels, I posted here this:

A long held belief was that the Belgian authorities turned a blind eye to radical Islamists and in return these terrorists didn’t ‘misbehave’ in Belgium.  That ‘compact’ has been well and truly broken. 

Brussels, or Jihadi Central, as it has sometimes been called, has come to realise that when you keep a poisonous snake, you must keep it properly caged, otherwise it will attack its hosts. Or you must remove the cause of the venomous nature.

You can’t blame the snake – that’s its nature.  It’s all it knows.  It’s what it is taught, day in and day out.  It starts at it’s mother’s breast, carries on through a schooling that is  dominated by a warped and murderous  religion and then is fed daily by local communities who are constantly told, by their liberal hosts that they are entitled and special and don’t need to assimilate into their host society;-

·      that it’s okay to mistreat women – because that’s your culture
·      that it’s okay to practice ritual slaughter – because that’s your religion
·      that it’s okay to mutilate women - because they are inferior
·      that it’s okay to ignore host country law – because you have Shariah law
·      that it’s okay to impose your Shariah law on non-believers -  because their dress or following entirely legal activities, such as drinking alcohol or eating pork, offends you.

This is the ideology that is pushed, day in and day out and make no mistake, the Gulf Arabs, fund this. 

When Angela Merkel threw open the doors of Germany to a swarm of refugees, Saudi Arabia, which has a fully functioning tent city that could immediately house three million refugees but instead houses none, offered financial assistance.  Not to house those refugees, not to feed them, not to create business to hire them. No, they committed funds to build 200 mosques across Germany.

We do not yet know the full details of the perpetrator of this atrocity but no one seriously doubts that it was the work of Islamic Terrorists.  Look at those two words – Islamic Terrorists.  Say them – Islamic Terrorists.  Did you manage that simple task?  No? Try again, Islamic Terrorists.  Got it now?  Now, get that into your head and every single time you hear Obama or Clinton speak, try, try really hard, to imagine how you would feel if those two people actually called it for what it is, instead of constantly mouthing platitudes such as ISIS (ISLAMIC State in Syria) is not about Islam.  Could you ever imagine George W or Ronald Reagan being so craven as to not call these slaughterers of the innocents for what they are?

Europeans, and I am mostly addressing the ‘Refugees Welcome’ crowd, need to accept that the risk from inviting in the Muslim hordes is that Europe has imported significant numbers of terrorists into our communities.  These communities are segregated – because Muslims don’t integrate – but the enemy is within. Be very clear on this.

The solution?  We find ourselves in a very difficult position.  We need to move very fast through the 5 stages of Grief.  We have had Denial for far too long.  Today, as in the immediate aftermath of all of the other atrocities, we have Anger.  We have had repeated efforts at Bargaining – denying the relevance of Islam to these murders, is a clear example.  Many are Depressed at the lack of progress and achievement.  We now need to get the people of Europe (and America, for that matter - Orlando shows you are not immune, to this death cult) to the Acceptance stage.

Acceptance of the fact that there is an enemy within.  That this enemy cannot be allowed to operate as a state within a state – so Shariah Law must be outlawed. 

Acceptance that this enemy cannot be allowed to operate as it does in its home countries.  No streets closed to allow praying in the middle of the road.  Christians, Hindus, Jews, Buddhists and Jedi manage to pray in their self-designated buildings, so should Muslims. Leaflets are being circulated in Manchester, England, asking non-Muslims to be sensitive to Islam considering dogs as haram (forbidden) and not to walk their dogs in ‘Muslim areas’.  That’s right the nation of dog-lovers is being told they cannot walk their dogs because it would offend Muslims.  In some areas of London, with very high Muslim populations, shops are being told that they cannot sell alcohol because it is against Islam.  The new, Muslim, Mayor of London, is banning advertisements,  that he considers ‘body shaming’, from London’s publicly run transport networks, These things are happening, while the Muslims are a minority.

Acceptance that immigration and indeed asylum applications, from Muslim countries, must cease, immediately.

Acceptance that Saudi Arabia, Qatar and other Arab Gulf countries are sponsors of Islamic Terrorists (hear those two little words, Obama and Hillary?) and must suffer the consequences of this.  That means not turning a blind eye to the proxy war now being fought in Yemen.  It means not allowing them to fund ‘our’ terrorists in Syria.  It means doing to them, what the West has done to Russia – impose sanctions. Travel sanctions, arms sale bans and freeze their financial assets.  Of course this will create instability in those countries – so be it.  I am quite comfortable with Saudi Muslims being killed by other Saudi Muslims, in Jeddah or Riyadh – better the fight and mayhem is there rather than on the streets of Paris, London, Orlando or Brussels.

Acceptance that all illegal immigrants in Europe, must be rounded up and deported to their home countries.  If there is resistance from local ‘communities’ – as was seen in Molenbeek, Brussels, when the police arrested one of the Paris Bataclan killers – then be very, very harsh.  If you resist, out of religious solidarity, then you will be punished, and severely so. This will require suspension of the European Charter on Human Rights but so be it.  A velvet glove is not the solution – now is the time for the iron fist.

Acceptance that enough is enough.  Europe simply cannot accept more and more invaders.  The people of Europe seem to be waking up to this.  The political elite will rue the day that they ignore the fast-building anger.

Please don’t post Je Suis Nice. Restrict your candle lighting and prayers for these slaughtered innocents, to church, synagogue or temple.  Instead use your energy to put politicians on notice that we are as mad as hell about this and we’re not going to take it, anymore.

Some recent postings on Islam – the religion of death are here , here and here

http://thismakesmemadyoutoo.blogspot.com/2016/03/brussels-follow-up.html

http://thismakesmemadyoutoo.blogspot.com/2016/03/europe-fight-back-or-die.html

http://thismakesmemadyoutoo.blogspot.com/2015/11/paris-and-denial.

htmlhttp://thismakesmemadyoutoo.blogspot.com/2015/11/jihadi-john-muslims-and-refugees.html







Saturday, April 23, 2016

Treachery from No. 10

Some might say that treachery is too harsh a word but I use this with intent.  The dictionary definitions all talk about betrayal of trust, deception, disloyalty and bad faith.  That seems to be a clear description of what has just transpired in London.

Charitably, we might say that the treachery came from over-zealous Number 10 speechwriters though I am minded to think that the words were all pre-approved by David Cameron, himself.

From Barack Obama, I didn’t expect anything positive.  Nothing to represent the wishes of the people of Britain.  After all, he is a strong proponent of the elite running the world rather than the voice of the people being heard.  Consider how he ignores the wishes of the American people and tries to rule by ‘Executive Order’ like a latter-day emperor.  I have long suspected Obama of being anti-British and his latest statements support my belief. 

I suppose he was influenced by his Kenyan father.  An awful lot of Africans raised in the colonial era, turned to the left for their political teaching and sought to blame their previous colonial  for the ills that befell their country, especially, post-independence.  It never occurs, to these people that having now enjoyed independence for 50+ years the mess that their countries are in, can be traced back to the imposition of left-wing ideologies that were not suited to Africa and, being left-wing, were always doomed to failure. 

But I digress.

Obama’s words and particularly the use of the British word ‘queue’, instead of the American ‘line’  are redolent of Cameron’s Project Fear team.  Number 10’s fingerprints are all over Obama’s threat to put a UK trade deal at the back of the line.  This man talks of a ‘special relationship’ and then threatens?  That is not the tone that Americans use, when talking to friends.  Obama’s words shame Americans. 

That won’t come as a surprise to many right-thinking Americans.  The Nobel Peace prize winner has a highly vindictive streak which he has displayed on many occasions, though mostly to his domestic ‘enemies’ (those who dare to disagree with the sainted Barack).

So back to Project Fear.

As has been said before, without a trade deal, UK exports to, and imports from, the US would be subject, under World Trade Organisation tariffs, to rates of 0-4%.  Hardly significant.  Indeed, one might wonder why we would even bother with a trade agreement.  But think of this another way, too.  The UK is the 5th largest export market for the USA.  Exports total $56.4 billion or 3.8% of total US exports.  Germany represents a $49.9 billion market for American goods or 3.3% of total.  However, the UK exports $58.8 billion to the USA or 2.5% of US imports.  Germany, on the other hand exports $126.5 billion to the USA.  So the UK has a miniscule trade surplus with the USA of $2.4 billion while Germany has a surplus of $76.6 billion.  Put another way, British and American workers benefit, just about equally from the trade between the two countries, however, American workers are severely disadvantaged by the heavy trade imbalance it has with Germany.

Many people who voted Conservative in the May 2015 General Election, will have done so because they trusted the Tories.  They trusted their economic competence, probably above all else.  However,  I am sure that many didn’t migrate in droves to UKIP because they saw that only the Conservatives could actually deliver a referendum on EU membership.  At the same time, they would have expected that when the choice was presented to the British people, then something approaching fair play, would be deployed. 

Instead, we are seeing more and more dirty tricks being used.  Obama’s threat is just the latest in a long line of statements and half truths and out-right lies that are being pedalled by the Remain campaign. 

So let’s be clear, since we are talking about trade and I apologise to regular readers, for having to repeat it. 

Without a formal trade treaty , WTO tariffs apply and these range from 0-4%.

Remainians need to explain why, Germany and France, indeed the  whole EU would not seek to swiftly conclude a trade deal with an independent-again UK.  The UK represents a very large existing export market  for both of those countries.  Who, in their right mind (so that caveat probably excludes the In crowd) would throw away such an advantage?  You will have seen French farmers protesting, in the past and seen how disruptive they are.  Imagine the protests when a major market becomes shut to them, because of a fit of pique from the Eurocrats in Brussels.

The big issue with trade isn’t that a treaty couldn’t be concluded, within the self-imposed 2 year time-frame.  The big issue is why, no preliminary steps are being taken on this matter.  I know that some might say ‘well if we vote to remain, then we will have wasted money’ but please – suddenly we are worried about government waste?  What about flipping that on its head and saying that any prudent government has a duty to consider and plan for all possible outcomes. Instead of Cameron stacking the deck against a Leave vote and seconding civil servants to the In campaign, resources should be assigned to the ‘what if’ camp.  As in ‘what if the UK votes to regain its independence, what are the implications and what do we do’?

Obama has failed in the USA – he has spent the best part of eight years, creating division in America.  Destroying the US economy, politicising appointments and public discourse, like no other President before him.  That is the ‘legacy’ for which he will be remembered.  Fortunately, his term of office has less than a year to run.  You will have noted though, his presumption that even out of office, he can dictate that any UK treaty request will be ‘back of the queue’.  At least he thinks he can.  The problem with jumped-up emperors is that they start to believe their own narrative – there is no delusion like self-delusion.

So Obama’s threat is anyway empty.  It is unbecoming America but there you go.

The treachery from Number 10 is far worse though.  Many Conservatives will struggle to forgive the badly-advised Cameron.  He has said he will resign as PM before the next election – no doubt in time (if he delivers an In vote) to take-up his reward as the next EU President!.  The prospects for George Osborne to succeed him are fading fast.  Theresa May and Philip Hammond too.   Maybe Boris Johnson will get the nod from the Conservative Party, though I wouldn’t discount Michael Gove’s chances.

My advice to Conservative voters, in the upcoming local elections is don’t vote or vote UKIP.  Cameron and his clique do not represent Conservative values and, just as importantly, don’t listen to those that do.  Their actions, since before the launch of the official EU Referendum campaigns has been all about doing what is right for themselves and not doing what is right for the country.  The negotiations were a farce, from start to finish.  The end result? A worthless document that was being rubbished before the press release was even wet off the presses.  And has continued to be down-played by the EU elite, ever since.  You would know this if the UK media hadn’t already bought into Cameron’s lies and deceit, from day one.


The treachery of Cameron and Co. cannot go unpunished.  Patriots who have faith in the UK to stand as an independent nation, as we have done so for so much of our history, only have their vote with which to punish Cameron.  Use it wisely and vote Brexit.  And it wouldn’t be a bad thing to give them a hammering at the local elections, either!