Showing posts with label election. Show all posts
Showing posts with label election. Show all posts

Friday, April 18, 2014

European elections

Voting for the European 'Parliament' will occur in early May.  This blog-post is particularly aimed at British readers but for other voting Europeans, my advice would be to punish, punish, punish, the anti-democratic forces currently running/ruining Europe.  Truth is, there isn't much choice out there as not many parties advocate pulling down the whole edifice.  Most just advocate 'reform'.

In the United Kingdom though, there is a real choice.  UKIP is a party that has the opportunity to send the largest number of MEPs to the European Parliament after this election.

UKIP don't argue for 'reform'.  Reform is like giving a terminal cancer patient a 'make-over'.  The lipstick, make-up, new clothes and hair will lift the spirits for a short while but the fundamental outcome isn't altered.

UKIP proposes withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union.

That said, this cannot be effected from the European Parliament.  So why bother voting for UKIP or for sceptical anti-EU Conservatives?

A strong turnout and a strong UKIP vote will raise the profile of Europe as a UK Parliamentary Election issue.  I sense that the main UK parties - Conservative, Labour and Liberal Democrats (and the European elite) want Europe to be a small side-issue in the next General Election.  They want to focus on the economy and spending.

Don't get me wrong, I fully understand the critical importance of the economy for most people.  Britain's economy is on a knife-edge or the edge of a precipice - use whatever analogy you like, we remain in a dangerous position. Public spending is still way too high, as is the country's indebtedness. 

It's just that I think that the  'Europe Union ', with its layers upon layers of regulations and directives is a significant contributor to the UK's economic malaise.  I know it isn't the EU that cossets a bloated and inefficient National Health Service - that ones down to successive weak governments pandering to people in thrall to the service providers.  The EU does though, even in the NHS, interfere and impose barriers and obligations and regulations which add to the overall cost of that organization.

And I therefore think that the Europe question needs to be close to the heart of the 2015 General Election.  I think it is that important.  The Europe question absolutely needs to be put to the people of Britain and, if you want to have the discussion on economic terrain, then okay. Let's do that and, in doing so, tie together the key issues facing Britain. 

That then is why it is important to get UKIP MEPs and anti-EU Conservatives elected in significant numbers in the upcoming European elections.  This will cause all of the 'main' parties to come clean on the Europe issue. 

The Conservatives have a commitment to put UK membership of the EU to a referendum.  Though the leadership still have a 'we can reform the EU' approach which is doomed to failure.  You don't reform junkies by giving them slightly less drugs!

Labour's position?  Who knows?  Certainly not Ed Miliband the puppet leader.  Perhaps the Labour paymaster, public service union leader,  Ed McCluskey can't decide and so that is why Labour's position is um, err, um, I'll get back to you on that!

Liberal Democrats?  Ardently pro-European.  This remember is the only stage where they can play with other 'nanny-staters' and feel more important and listened-to, than they are at home.  They did though previously promise a referendum and then broke that promise but that's not the first one that they have reneged on.

So, my advice is vote UKIP in the European Elections or Conservative, where you have a Euro-sceptic one, and then vote Conservative in the General Election., with the hope that the Conservative leadership read the message from the electorate and move in a sceptical direction.

Just don't vote Labour or Liberal Democrat but do vote!



Sunday, May 6, 2012

So what now, for the Coalition?

Firstly, both the Conservatives and the Lib Dems should understand that there is a message and it isn't n opportunity to put some kind of spin on things.

Yes, the last time that these seats were contested, these parties did well and so, the 'pendelum' effect means that this time they were almost bound to lose seats.  But, why both parties?  Why so heavily?  And, why, at a time when the public have moved towards understanding the need for austerity, (to at least varying degrees) would they move to ever higher spending Labour?  This is the same Labour that have never apologised for their economic incompetence!

It seems obvious to say, but the only answer is that the electorate that voted, wanted to punish the Coalition.  I don't believe it is because of the alleged cuts (check out the actual level of 'cuts' and you will see that public expenditure is being reduced at a far too low rate, if at all.)

No, I believe it's because the Coalition is fundamentally flawed.

Cameron and Clegg are committed to trying to do what is right for the country. 

  • Cameron thinks this requires being magnanimous and a 'gentleman' - so he doesn't push Conservative policies down Clegg's throat - it's not the 'done thing'.
  • Clegg was the photo-genic candidate for leader that could add votes for the Lib Dems and not scare the voters, while at the same time not getting in the way of the unruly Lib Dem MPs and party activists who wanted to continue to pursue their 'student' politics approach to life at Westminster or in local town halls.

So we have Cameron, bending over backwards to be nice to Clegg and Clegg unable to control his party.

Result?  The electorate see through this and see that the majority Coalition partner (the Conservatives, in case you have forgotten) are fumbling and have no coherent policy.  They have, to use the spin-meister phrase, no narrative. 

What do they stand for?
  • If it's the 'Granny Tax' or 'Pasty Tax' why can't these be clearly enunciated?
  • Why aren't we seeing power being reclaimed from Europe?
  • Why is the UK supporting the failed Euro project?  Don't bother trying to say it's because they are a major trading partner and the rest of that.  We are throwing good money after bad and trying to deny the inevitable - the tide has turned and it's time to get off of the beach!
  • Why is time being wasted on changing the definition of marriage?  Where is the groundswell of public clamour for this?
  • Why are we funding and keeping our UK armed forces in Afghanistan?
  • Why is parliamentary time to be wasted on reform of the House of Lords - I understand the Lib Dems want this but why can't the Conservatives adopt the Nancy Reagan response and 'Just say No!'

I could go on (and on and on) but you get the idea.

We have a Conservative led Coalition that seems to want to do everything that is un-Conservative, to kowtow to their junior partner and seems to have no idea, other than the retention of power, exactly what it is trying to do, in Government.

When will Conservative MPs understand that their complete acquiescence and obeisance to the Lib Dems means that they will pay the price at the ballot box, for their lack of a spine?

UKIP anyone?