The leaders of the European Union are meeting, just now, to try and come up with a solution to the problem of migrants who risk their lives fleeing Libya and heading to mainland Europe.
Surely the best solution, indeed, the only sensible solution is simply to turn-around the boats that leave Libya and send them back to Libya and to keep on doing this. In effect, establish a naval blockade of Libya. If the boats become un-seaworthy or are deliberately scuttled by the migrants or their traffickers, then rescue the people and put them back onto Libya's beaches.
Allowing these migrants to get into Europe, as has already been done, just tells others that this is a gateway. This gateway must be closed.
Some other observations.
Why don't those Nigerians that are fleeing Boko Haram, move to the South of Nigeria? There is no Boko Haram there!
Why don't those fleeing Eritrea and Somalia and so on, travel to Saudi Arabia or Egypt or Algeria? All are co-religionists and in the case of Saudi Arabia, the migrants would have a found a rich country, in which to find work and happiness.
Have any of those that say that the EU must launch rescue missions, considered how many of these people might be Al Qaeda or Daesh supporters?
Why do so many of these migrants have a single destination - the UK - in mind? In addition to providing Royal Navy resources to close the Libya gateway, the UK government must impress upon France the need for them to better manage migrant camps in that country and the UK government must impose full- check border controls at the UK border ports and immediately deport, before these people enter into England, all of these migrants. Yes it will cause some chaos at southern ports but the benefits far outweighs the inconvenience. These people simply cannot be allowed to come under the auspices of the Human Rights legislation. If they do, Immigration Tribunals and leftist Justices, who live far from the consequences of unfettered immigration, will continue to ride rough-shod over the wishes of the British people and our elected officials.
Oh, and a question for the biased BBC. When you push the story of the plight of these 'poor migrants' maybe ask them how they can afford iPhones? Your 'right-on' reporter in the Calais 'Somalia' camp seemed so en-amoured with them that she missed the obvious!
Surely the best solution, indeed, the only sensible solution is simply to turn-around the boats that leave Libya and send them back to Libya and to keep on doing this. In effect, establish a naval blockade of Libya. If the boats become un-seaworthy or are deliberately scuttled by the migrants or their traffickers, then rescue the people and put them back onto Libya's beaches.
Allowing these migrants to get into Europe, as has already been done, just tells others that this is a gateway. This gateway must be closed.
Some other observations.
Why don't those Nigerians that are fleeing Boko Haram, move to the South of Nigeria? There is no Boko Haram there!
Why don't those fleeing Eritrea and Somalia and so on, travel to Saudi Arabia or Egypt or Algeria? All are co-religionists and in the case of Saudi Arabia, the migrants would have a found a rich country, in which to find work and happiness.
Have any of those that say that the EU must launch rescue missions, considered how many of these people might be Al Qaeda or Daesh supporters?
Why do so many of these migrants have a single destination - the UK - in mind? In addition to providing Royal Navy resources to close the Libya gateway, the UK government must impress upon France the need for them to better manage migrant camps in that country and the UK government must impose full- check border controls at the UK border ports and immediately deport, before these people enter into England, all of these migrants. Yes it will cause some chaos at southern ports but the benefits far outweighs the inconvenience. These people simply cannot be allowed to come under the auspices of the Human Rights legislation. If they do, Immigration Tribunals and leftist Justices, who live far from the consequences of unfettered immigration, will continue to ride rough-shod over the wishes of the British people and our elected officials.
Oh, and a question for the biased BBC. When you push the story of the plight of these 'poor migrants' maybe ask them how they can afford iPhones? Your 'right-on' reporter in the Calais 'Somalia' camp seemed so en-amoured with them that she missed the obvious!
No comments:
Post a Comment