I posted on this site, after the Scottish Independence
Referendum and UK’s 2015 General Election that Scotland’s First Minister,
Nicola Sturgeon should ‘wind her neck in’.
That she had a sense of her own and her country’s importance to the
United Kingdom which is far in excess of reality.
Before we go on, let’s just recap a few numbers.
Scotland’s economy is less than 10% of the UK’s
total. Same applies to population and,
given the last fact, the number of MPs that Scotland sends to Westminster. The most telling fact though is that absent
fiscal transfers from the rest of the UK – which really means from England –
then Scotland would be running a deficit around 10% of GDP.
A couple of other numbers. Turnout in the Scottish Independence
Referendum was 85% and the 2 million who voted for Scotland to remain as part
of the United Kingdom represented 55% of the total. The turnout in Scotland, for the EU
Referendum was 67% and 1.66 million (62%) voted to Remain.
In case you are feeling swamped with numbers, let me
re-cap. More people in Scotland could be
bothered to vote in the IndyRef and the number of people voting to remain in
the United Kingdom outnumbered those who voted to remain in the EU.
Somehow though, Sturgeon and her SNP fanatics think
that they have a mandate to negotiate for Scotland to leave the United Kingdom
and remain in the European Union.
I know! Your
head is now swimming.
What kind of independence would Scotland have, tying
itself into the European Union?
Where is the so-called mandate for ignoring the result
of a United Kingdom-wide referendum? Last time I looked, there was a simple
enough question on the EU Referendum ballot – Leave or Remain were the
choices. There was nothing about Leave ,
Remain or, if we don’t like the answer, we can break-up the United Kingdom.
Zero. Same question was asked and
answered by more than 33.5 million people across the United Kingdom and the
result was a resounding 52% in favour of Leave.
Oh and as a further point, Scotland had the lowest EU Referendum turnout
among the regions of the United Kingdom. Hardly a ringing endorsement for Scotland's membership of the EU.
This didn’t stop the ever pushy Sturgeon though. Straightaway she is mouthing off about the
probable/possible need for a new Scottish Independence Referendum (IndyRef
2). You will note the slight hesitancy –
I will come back to that.
In the days immediately following the EU referendum,
Sturgeon flew to Brussels and met with the leaders of some European
countries. Not all of them because many
couldn’t fit her into their schedule – or couldn’t be bothered. She came away from Brussels with something of
a ‘flea in her ear’. As could have been
predicted before she even began the air-miles collecting trip, Spain stated
that they would veto any application from Scotland, while Scotland remained
part of the UK. To say that she came
away empty-handed is incorrect. She was
told, very, very clearly, that while Scotland remained a member of the United Kingdom,
the EU would not even discuss Scottish membership of the EU. Not even going to get on the agenda.
Couldn’t be clearer.
Of course, that doesn’t stop Sturgeon and her SNP StormTroopers from
claiming that exit from the United Kingdom and entry into the European Union is
a straightforward and realistic option.
You must judge for yourself if these people are
self-deluded fools or outright liars.
If you live in Scotland though, you might consider
launching a claim, on behalf of the Scottish taxpayer, against Sturgeon for a
gross waste of taxpayer funds and dereliction of duty. If you are the UK Attorney-General, you might
also consider charges.
Why? Well. Foreign affairs are not a devolved
responsibility. In other words, Sturgeon
had absolutely no business in going to
Brussels at the expense of the Scottish parliament. I would posit that in doing so, she was pursuing
an exclusively political and solely SNP policy.
It is not the business of the Scottish Government to undertake any
foreign negotiations. I suppose a ‘blind
eye’ was turned regarding the Edinburgh Zoo pandas but that is a long way from
seeking to undermine the position of the United Kingdom, of which Scotland
remains a constituent member. Not sure
if it would count as treasonous but imagine the situation if the UK actually
was at war with the EU – would anyone tolerate Sturgeon’s opportunistic
behaviour?
All of that aside, for a moment.
There is another reason why Scotland wouldn’t be
allowed to join the EU. Their deficit,
at around 10% of GDP, is way above the maximum 3% allowed by the EU. In order to meet the requirements, Scotland
would have to undertake massive cuts. We’re
not talking about austerity or austerity plus.
No, these cuts would be austerity on steroids at a dosage level that
would make a Russian athlete blush.
Public sector employment in Scotland, accounts for 21% of the workforce. Obviously that is where these cuts would be
made. One has to seriously question the
capacity of the private sector, to accommodate or grow to do so, such an influx
of workers.
Then, assuming that there is anything left of the
economy, the Scots would, on joining the European Union have to join the Euro –
assuming that failing and flailing currency is still around. Think about that. 70% of all of Scotland’s export, excluding
oil and gas, are sent to the rest of the United Kingdom. If for no other reason, Scotland and its ‘gobby’
First Minister, should be fully behind the United Kingdom getting the best and
lowest or tariff free trade terms as part of the renegotiations which will soon
commence. Scotland’s non-state economy
will be subject to those tariffs, if Sturgeon gets her way, and they will also have to trade,
with their overwhelmingly largest market, in a currency requiring foreign exchange.
I believe that the issue of Scottish Independence is
effectively dead. The message maybe hasn’t
got through to the SNP leadership yet,
but the Scottish people are not stupid.
Given the 2014 vote again, I am very confident they would vote to remain
in the United Kingdom by an even larger margin.
I say the message maybe hasn’t got through to the SNP
yet. Really though, I think they do
understand the position. I believe that
they are using the EU Referendum as a smokescreen or a so-called ‘false flag’ to
hide their inadequacy and mis-management of those areas for which the Scottish
parliament does have responsibility –
Education, Health and Policing, for example.
In all three areas, the Holyrood parliament is failing and failing the
people of Scotland, very badly. The
Scottish Oil & Gas industry is in dire straits and the Scottish parliament
has no real policy to aid this vital industry.
Heavens! Even though fracking in Scotland, might provide some relief,
the parliament has not made a decision on this and is seen to not support it.
So given the above, why am I so worked-up about
this?
Well it is because the government in Westminster is
pandering to the SNP. The SNP now think
that they have a veto over Brexit. They
need to be told, very, very firmly, that while they, along with all other
parties and other relevant constituencies in the United Kingdom, will be
consulted, the decision will be made whether they agree with it or not. Theresa May’s government, govern for the
benefit of all of the United Kingdom and the UK, as a whole, voted for
Brexit. Theresa May has said ‘Brexit
means Brexit’. She has appointed a
Cabinet to implement this and the so-called Brexit minister – David Davis –a well
qualified minister, is very capable
individual and he should stick resolutely to his brief and get it done.
So, Theresa May.
Please use every opportunity to keep Nicola Sturgeon in her place. Maybe also have a word with the Attorney
General?
Nicola Sturgeon – do your job! That means staying in Scotland and focussing
on housing, education, policing, NHS Scotland and the oil and gas
industry. That is what you and your
party were elected to do. That and that’s
all.
Great Blog .I found it right on the money re this nonsense
ReplyDeleteThanks.
DeleteI would really like to see the UK government take a firm hand to Sturgeon and to very publicly 'slap her down'. She is meddling in matters outside of her remit and, in the process, causing a distraction that might be detrimental to the people of the UK.