Readers of a sensitive or liberal disposition should
read no further. This won’t be to your
liking.
I have asked before, on these pages, when is enough,
enough? How many Europeans (or Americans
for that matter) must die under the knife, bomb or gun of radical Islam before
the quiescent politicians decide that they must finally protect the host
population – their electorate – and the host culture?
The following apply particularly to the United
Kingdom, the country with which I am most familiar but could equally be adapted
and adopted for other Western nations.
The will likely be seen as anti-Muslim and some might call them racist
or even Nazi. Since Islam isn’t a ‘race’
that charge would be grossly inaccurate and calling everyone with whom you
disagree, a Nazi shows only a blind ignorance of what Nazism was about. This piece also cannot be considered as a ‘hate
crime’, since all it advocates is that Muslims - refugees and immigrants and
indigenous – comply with the same laws that are applied to others.
In the UK, there are said to be around 3,000
individuals that are under terror watch.
That is these individuals have been identified by the security services
as being somewhat active and a potential danger to UK society. It is not clear how many of this 3,000 are
returning ‘jihadis’ of which there are estimated to be around 500 in
number.
Let’s say the total number of people that represent a
security threat to Britain are around 3,500.
I would propose that internment camps be established, guarded by the
military, and these people interred. The
initial term of internment to be between 3-5-10 years depending upon the weight
of evidence, however such evidence has been obtained – illegal wiretaps,
informers, etc., The term to be decided
by a panel of judges.
Yes, that’s right.
Britain should establish and house its very own Guantanamo.
OK, so those liberals that have read this far are now
foaming at the mouth. However, it is
crystal clear that the security services have neither the manpower numbers nor
the ethnic mix of manpower to enable them to adequately monitor the threat
posed by these potentially dangerous individuals. We need these people off of our streets. I accept that some innocents may be swept up
as part of this but believe that the greater good is served by taking these
people out of circulation. Yes, in some
respects we must suspend some of our cherished civil liberties, for a time, to
preserve them. Those that seek the
overthrow of our societies are no civil libertarians!
Allied to the above measure, the families of those
individuals would, where possible, be deported to their home countries. That is, if the spouse was not born in
Britain, then they and their children would be sent to their home country. Those that were born in Britain would be
allowed to remain but would be ineligible to receive any state benefits. Not receive any – so no free housing, no
welfare, no child benefit, no working tax credit, no free NHS – nothing.
Talking of state benefits, they should be withdrawn,
with no right of appeal, from any family where a child has been found to have
been subjected to Female Genital Mutilation (FGM). Again, in such cases, where one of the
parents was non-UK born, then the family to be deported. No right of appeal. FGM is a barbaric custom which adds to the
subjugation of women and has no place in civilised society (or indeed in any
society). I would go one step further
and require that all girls in the UK, under the age of 16, undergo a medical
examination, every two years and those who have suffered FGM be thus
identified.
I am not a lawyer but to me it seems to be bordering
on treason to want to overthrow the legal system of the United Kingdom and
replace this with the completely alien, Sharia Law. Therefore, I believe that the promotion of
such a law should, if not already a crime, be made so. The UK legal system has evolved over more
than a thousand years and is widely respected (and often emulated) around the
world. We need to retain this system and
importantly under no circumstances allow any kind of parallel system to be
present or have any standing in the UK. Yes,
I know that UK law is largely liberal and much of what I am proposing goes
against the deeply ingrained traditions but desperate times call for desperate
measures.
I don’t know about you but the overly public displays
by Muslims of their religion also need to cease. So, no more blocking of streets while people
kneel and pray. There are more than
sufficient numbers of mosques. So, no
more calls to prayer. The minarets
should be silenced. To me these speak of
an arrogant demonstration of a ‘holier than thou’ domination of areas.
On the subject of overly public displays, I do not
find the hijab objectionable but the full burqa and the niqab should be banned
as they hide so much that one wouldn’t know if the hidden individual is a woman
or a man nor if the person was a wanted individual.
Speaking of mosques, do not allow the building of a
single new mosque – not one. In the West,
we have a tolerance towards Islam which is not in any way reciprocated in
countries like Saudi Arabia. There is
not one single Christian church in Saudi Arabia, indeed one is not even allowed
to bring a bible into the country!
Sticking with Islamic ‘customs’ – just as we cannot
allow Sharia Law to be practised in the UK, neither can we allow polygamy. Our custom in the UK is one marriage and our
law is one marriage and that must apply equally, to all.
Going back to benefits - and this to apply to all –
any benefits paid to be restricted to four children.
Again, applying to all immigrants and refugees – any conviction
for a crime of violence, for rape, for trafficking, for drugs or child sex
offences would result in automatic deportation for the perpetrator and his/her immediate
family upon completion of prison sentence.
Staying with immigrants and refugees, any employer
that utilises an illegal immigrant or refugee should be fined £100,000 per
illegal employee and serve a minimum 6-month prison sentence.
It is important also that the failed policy of ‘multi-culturalism’
be abandoned. All immigrants and
refugees need to learn how to speak, read and write English. All organisations should cease publishing documents
in multiple languages – be it Urdu, Arabic, Polish or Tagalog, we should only
be using the English language.
So, overall, the message is that enough is
enough. We in the West can simply no
longer be our naturally tolerant selves.
We need to change. We need to
change so as to preserve our culture and society. If we don’t change, then we will perish and
become subject to and dominated by an alien religion and alien ways. Much of the foregoing is naturally focussed
on Islam and its adherents – principally because it is they that, having seen
how good life is in the West, then want to change it to reflect what they have
left behind.
Think about that.
They want to come to the West because we have developed societies that
are open and successful. Then, when they
get here, they want to change those societies to reflect life and conditions in
unsuccessful countries like Pakistan or Syria or Somalia. If life is so good in those countries, why
not stay there? Ever wonder why the
refugees from the Middle East and Africa all flock to Europe? Surely those from Syria could flee to Saudi
Arabia or Qatar or UAE? Saudi Arabia even has
a tent city with 100,000 air-conditioned tents!
Trouble is though, those countries have taken no refugees, not one!
If we don’t stand-up for our Western societies – which
I admit are not heavenly utopias – then they will fall. If not now, when? How many must die in Paris Nice, Berlin,
Brussels or Westminster before we say enough and start to fight back. We need to fight back now, using our laws and
legal systems and parliamentary majorities.
If we don’t, then the populists, so reviled by the media and, let’s face
it, politicians, will start to take the law into their own hands.
